Federico Fuentes
When Bolivian President
Evo Morales announced in May that his government was allowing oil and
gas drilling in national parks, mainstream and progressive media outlets
alike were quick to condemn his supposed hypocrisy on environmental
issues.
Writing for the Associated Press, Frank Bajak argued that although known
internationally for his outspoken campaigning on climate change, at
home Morales faces constant criticism from conservationists “who say he
puts extraction ahead of clean water and forests.”
Bajak said this contradiction was a result of Morales’ strategy of
developing extractive industries as a means for reducing poverty,
irrespective of the environmental cost.
Along a similar vein, Emily Achtenberg wrote on the NACLA website that
Morales’ announcement highlighted a central contradiction his government
faces: having relied on oil and gas to finance successful
redistributive programs, his government now finds itself “at odds with
indigenous, environmental, and other civil society organizations who
argue that extractivism destroys nature and communities ...”
Oddly however, none of these media outlets have devoted a single article
to how the Bolivian government has presided over what is arguably one
of the most remarkable environmental achievements in recent years.
This content was originally published by teleSUR at the following address:
http://www.telesurtv.net/english/opinion/Why-the-Media-Distorts-Bolivias-Environmental-Record-20150722-0016.html. If you intend to use it, please cite the source and provide a link to the original article. www.teleSURtv.net/english
-->
When Bolivian President
Evo Morales announced in May that his government was allowing oil and gas drilling in national parks, mainstream
and progressive media outlets alike were quick to condemn his supposed
hypocrisy on environmental issues.
Writing
for the Associated Press, Frank Bajak argued that although known internationally
for his outspoken campaigning on climate change, at home Morales faces constant
criticism from conservationists “who say he puts extraction ahead of clean
water and forests.”
Bajak
said this contradiction was a result of Morales’ strategy of developing
extractive industries as a means for reducing poverty, irrespective of the
environmental cost.
Along
a similar vein, Emily Achtenberg wrote on the NACLA website that
Morales’ announcement highlighted a central contradiction his
government faces: having relied on oil and gas to finance successful
redistributive programs, his government now finds itself “at odds with
indigenous, environmental, and other civil society organizations who argue that
extractivism destroys nature and communities….”
Oddly however,
none of these media outlets have devoted a single article to how the Bolivian
government has presided over what is arguably one of the most remarkable
environmental achievements in recent years.....
When Bolivian President
Evo Morales announced in May that his government was allowing oil and
gas drilling in national parks, mainstream and progressive media outlets
alike were quick to condemn his supposed hypocrisy on environmental
issues.
Writing for the Associated Press, Frank Bajak argued that although known
internationally for his outspoken campaigning on climate change, at
home Morales faces constant criticism from conservationists “who say he
puts extraction ahead of clean water and forests.”
Bajak said this contradiction was a result of Morales’ strategy of
developing extractive industries as a means for reducing poverty,
irrespective of the environmental cost.
Along a similar vein, Emily Achtenberg wrote on the NACLA website that
Morales’ announcement highlighted a central contradiction his government
faces: having relied on oil and gas to finance successful
redistributive programs, his government now finds itself “at odds with
indigenous, environmental, and other civil society organizations who
argue that extractivism destroys nature and communities ...”
Oddly however, none of these media outlets have devoted a single article
to how the Bolivian government has presided over what is arguably one
of the most remarkable environmental achievements in recent years.
This content was originally published by teleSUR at the following address:
http://www.telesurtv.net/english/opinion/Why-the-Media-Distorts-Bolivias-Environmental-Record-20150722-0016.html. If you intend to use it, please cite the source and provide a link to the original article. www.teleSURtv.net/english
When Bolivian President
Evo Morales announced in May that his government was allowing oil and
gas drilling in national parks, mainstream and progressive media outlets
alike were quick to condemn his supposed hypocrisy on environmental
issues.
Writing for the Associated Press, Frank Bajak argued that although known
internationally for his outspoken campaigning on climate change, at
home Morales faces constant criticism from conservationists “who say he
puts extraction ahead of clean water and forests.”
Bajak said this contradiction was a result of Morales’ strategy of
developing extractive industries as a means for reducing poverty,
irrespective of the environmental cost.
Along a similar vein, Emily Achtenberg wrote on the NACLA website that
Morales’ announcement highlighted a central contradiction his government
faces: having relied on oil and gas to finance successful
redistributive programs, his government now finds itself “at odds with
indigenous, environmental, and other civil society organizations who
argue that extractivism destroys nature and communities ...”
Oddly however, none of these media outlets have devoted a single article
to how the Bolivian government has presided over what is arguably one
of the most remarkable environmental achievements in recent years.
This content was originally published by teleSUR at the following address:
http://www.telesurtv.net/english/opinion/Why-the-Media-Distorts-Bolivias-Environmental-Record-20150722-0016.html. If you intend to use it, please cite the source and provide a link to the original article. www.teleSURtv.net/english
No comments:
Post a Comment