Bolivia’s cogent responses to recent provocations from the Empire
Richard Fidler, La Paz,
reposted from Life on the Left
Washington’s refusal to allow
Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro to over-fly its colony of Puerto Rico,
September 19, attracted little attention in the North American and European
media.
But in Latin America this arrogant
gesture drew immediate outrage. It recalled the July 2 denial by four European
countries — France, Italy, Spain and Portugal — of landing and refueling rights
and passage through their airspace to Bolivia’s president Evo Morales while he
was returning home from a trip to Moscow. This unprecedented attack on
Bolivia’s sovereignty, clearly at Washington’s behest, had been defended on the
fallacious grounds that Morales’ plane harboured US espionage whistle-blower
Edward Snowden.
Evo Morales was quick to take the
lead in the Latin American response to this latest incident involving
Venezuela’s Maduro. Initially, he called on the presidents of countries in ALBA
and UNASUR[1] to boycott the current session of the United Nations General
Assembly to protest the US “aggression.” However, discussions with his
counterparts resulted in an agreement instead to attend in force the UN
meetings in order to raise their objections. (Maduro deferred on the grounds of
an alleged plot to kill him if he went to New York, the UN headquarters.)
Morales also proposed to the other
Latin American presidents that they consider collectively expelling US
ambassadors from their countries, as Bolivia did a few years ago to protest
Washington’s interference in its internal affairs. And he proposed that they
discuss the possibility of launching international legal proceedings against
Barack Obama for his repeated violations of international law and diplomacy.
In his UN address on September 25,
Morales called for establishment of a people’s tribunal, with support from
international human rights organizations, to try Obama for offences of
“lèse-humanité.” As examples of Obama’s crimes against humanity he cited the
aerial bombing of Libya, events in Iraq and the US world-wide interventionism
aimed at seizing possession of “our natural resources.”
Since the death of Hugo Chávez earlier
this year, Morales has emerged as the Latin American leader most engaged in
exposing the crimes of the US and other imperialist powers and projecting an
alternative anti-capitalist approach on a continental and global scale.
He was quick to turn the act of air
piracy on July 2 into a mobilizer of official and popular anti-imperialist
action. Following an emergency summit in
early July of a number of Latin American presidents to protest this incident,
the Bolivian government, along with Bolivian social organizations grouped in
the Pacto de Unidad, proceeded to organize a people’s international summit in
opposition to imperialism and colonialism.
Held in Cochabamba July 31-August
2, the summit was attended by some 1,200 persons representing 90 organizations
in Latin America and Europe. During the three days, a formal declaration
drafted by the Bolivians was debated, amended and supplemented by six mesas or
workshops. Originally, five mesa topics were planned: on
Political Sovereignty, Economic Sovereignty, Decolonization and
Anti-Imperialism, International Human Rights Treaties and Espionage. At the
initiative of some delegations, including Venezuela’s, a sixth was added: Communications
Counter-offensive.
On the final day, August 2 —
exactly one month after the July 2 incident — participants joined in a massive
closing rally and march through Cochabamba that was addressed by Evo Morales.
Estimates of the number of those demonstrating ranged up to a million.
“We have to form an alliance,”
Morales told the rally, “we have to unite our anti-imperialist social
movements, political parties and governments of Latin America and the Caribbean
with those in Europe to liberate ourselves from North American imperialism.
This August 2, for me, is the day of Anti-Imperialism….” He called for building
“a world movement for sovereignty and for the liberation of the peoples.”
The final
declaration, as amended by the mesas, was read out at
the rally. In addition, many websites published as well the full text of the
resolutions adopted by the mesas. To my knowledge
there is no English translation of the full text of the declaration or the
resolutions. Below I have translated large excerpts of the declaration, along
with a summary of some sections while noting the addition of some further
demands adopted by the relevant mesas. Taken together, these
statements provide an insight into the major themes and perspectives of the
left today in Latin America in particular.
AGAINST IMPERIALISM AND COLONIZATION: SIX STRATEGIES FOR SOVEREIGNTY, DIGNITY AND
THE LIFE OF THE PEOPLES
An Anti-Imperialist and
Anticolonialist Summit of the Peoples of Latin America and the world has been
held in Bolivia at a time of imperial counter-offensive aimed at silencing the
voice of rebelliousness of the people struggling for another possible world in
which we will have achieved the emancipation of human beings and Mother Earth.
Therefore, assembled in
Cochabamba from July 31 to August 2, 2013, we declare as follows:
The current crisis of capitalism is
a crisis of multiple dimensions: a crisis of finance, production, the climate,
food, energy, politics and ideology. In short, a crisis of civilization that
threatens the life of capitalism as such, but also of humanity and the planet .
However, faced with this crisis, and in desperate attempts to revive and
strengthen this system, pro-capitalist and pro-imperialist governments are
promoting further privatizations, the pillage of Mother Earth, the destruction
of social rights, and the plunder of natural resources.
Amidst this crisis, the wars and coups
promoted by the Empire are aimed at installing puppet governments and capturing
strategic natural resources. Invasions of countries and sabotage of processes
of change are the Empire’s responses to the crisis of the capitalist system.
The imperial counter-offensive
began with the NATO intervention in the dismemberment of many of the countries
of the socialist camp and the former Yugoslavia, where it launched a
territorial fragmentation strategy that imperialism has since been trying to
use in Bolivia, Venezuela and Ecuador.
The invasions of Afghanistan and
Iraq were another aspect of this historical period as the Empire sought to
seize their natural resources and deploy a range of geopolitical strategies
aimed at maintaining the pattern of North-South relations and preventing
reinforcement of South-South relations.
Likewise, starting after 2008 with
the administration of Barack Obama, imperialism has taken the path of a major
military offensive aimed at overcoming the crisis of capitalism. Libya became the
first victim and now the focus is on Syria and Iran with the complicity of the
United Nations, whose Security Council has been virtually kidnapped by the
United States, England and France.
The transnational military arm of
the United States is called NATO. Its new strategic concept has made the planet
a global theatre for its operations. Latin America now finds itself threatened
by Colombia’s request to become a co-operative partner of NATO.
Another manifestation of the global
counter-offensive of imperialism is the violation of the international
conventions and treaties that emerged after World War II. Since the invasion of
Iraq, the U.S. and its European partners in NATO have made it more than clear
that their geopolitical interests in commandeering the world’s natural
resources prevail over the international order.
One of the latest violations of
that international order is the kidnapping of President Evo Morales last July
2, when four European countries denied him the right to refuel and the use of
airspace, putting his life in jeopardy. Clearly there is a before and after
since July 2, 2013. Nor is it accidental that the only country that allowed the
landing was Austria, which is not a member of NATO.
The world capitalist
counteroffensive is expressed in Latin America with the opening of more
military bases on our continent: the implementation of Plan Colombia, the
Mérida Initiative,[2] the Andean Initiative[3] and the Caribbean
Basin Initiative[4]; the failed and defeated coups against Chávez in Venezuela
(2002), Morales in Bolivia (2008) and Rafael Correa in Ecuador (2010); the
military coup against Manuel Zelaya in Honduras (2009), and the activation of
the Fourth Fleet (to control the ocean through the possibility of rapid
deployment).
Following the defeat of the Free
Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA) at Mar del Plata in 2005, imperialism has
rearmed politically and economically, promoting the Pacific Alliance as a bloc
of pro-free trade countries that is intended to counter politically, economically
and ideologically the integration processes in the region; it is aimed
especially at reconfiguring the geopolitical balance of forces and acting as a
counterweight to the growing influence of ALBA, which relies instead on
strengthening UNASUR and CELAC. The Pacific Alliance represents an attempt to
replicate the neocolonial model of the FTAA.
Imperialism and colonialism are
using the media as the most appropriate instruments to disorient our peoples
and to undermine social support for our progressive governments. They are also
developing sophisticated technological networks as part of the intrusion and
interference of U.S. imperialism in our countries.
To confront this very difficult
context, the movements and peoples of the world gathered in Cochabamba have
agreed to oppose imperialism and colonialism by implementing six strategies for
sovereignty and the dignity and life of our peoples.
[From here on, I summarize
the contents of this lengthy document. – RF]
STRATEGY 1
STRENGTHENING THE SOVEREIGNTY OF THE WORLD’S PEOPLES BY FIGHTING THE IMPERIAL AND MILITARISTIC
INSTRUMENTS OF DOMINATION LIKE NATO
The introduction to this section
recounts the formation of NATO in 1949 as the primary imperialist alliance
during the Cold War, and its use since the fall of the Soviet Union as an
instrument to uphold the worldwide geopolitical and economic interests of the
US and other imperialist powers and to keep the world safe for capitalism.
The document calls on the peoples
and countries of the South to mobilize in opposition to NATO and related
imperialist alliances and to oppose invasions of sovereign countries and the
plunder of natural resources. “Without nationalization of natural resources
there is no sovereignty,” it says. And it calls for the creation of an
“Observatory of the Neo-coupism and Military Interventionism of the United
States and its Armed Wing, NATO.”
Among the efforts it recommends to
free the peoples of the world from colonialism it calls for sustained
campaigning against the US blockade of Cuba and its revolution, “a revolution
of all the world’s peoples,” and for the return of the Malvinas (a.k.a. the
Falkland Islands) to Argentina. And it calls for international mobilization to
modify the composition of the UN Security Council and to “democratize” it by
increasing the representation of the “developing countries” on the Council.
The workshop on this topic adopted
a number of proposals that were not included in the final text. Among these:
· Establish July 2 as an
International Day Against Imperialism, to represent emancipation of peoples and
especially of the Plurinational State of Bolivia, in rejection of the attack on
President Evo Morales;
· Hold the second Anti-imperialist,
Anticapitalist and Anticolonialist Summit for the Sovereignty of the Peoples
and Security of Human Rights in Venezuela on March 5, 2014, in homage to the
memory of Hugo Chávez; and
· Participate in the World Youth
and Student Festival in Quito, Ecuador, December 7-13, 2013.
STRATEGY 2
ALLIANCE AND MOBILIZATION OF THE PEOPLES TO PREVENT THE
RESTORATION OF NEOLIBERALISM AND THE FTAA
This section singles out the
Pacific Alliance as an instrument for the restoration of privatization of
services and natural resource development based on so-called free trade and
investment agreements, an attempt to recreate the frustrated Free Trade Area of
the Americas and to counter the efforts toward unification and political unity
in Latin America through such alliances as ALBA, MERCOSUR, UNASUR and CELAC.
Among the specific actions it
proposes are “the promotion and recognition of development models defined in
sovereignty by the peoples of the world based on solidarity,
complementarity, vivir bien, and harmony with Mother Earth….” It
calls for “alternative economic projects that recognize, respect and strengthen
the communitarian, indigenous and ancestral structures of our peoples, and that
promote socialism, the economy of vivir bien distinct from
capitalism.”
The capitalist model, it says,
should be countered by building along socialist lines, “based on socially-owned
enterprises and recognition of the plural, state and communitarian social
economy.” This entails “state support for a productive sector based on associated
small and micro enterprises, communitarian social associations, and a
solidaristic and cooperative social economy” – all of which, it says, are major
job creators – along with “state enterprises committed to the sovereignty and
dignity of the peoples and the democratization of wealth.”
To fight “consumerism and
commercialization [mercantilismo],” it is fundamental to “consume our
own products, our own safe and healthy foods.”
Technological sovereignty, the
statement says, involves developing knowledge and innovation in a framework of
a dialogue between ancient communal indigenous and peasant knowledges and
modern learning and technologies.
It urges support for the people of
Bolivia in that landlocked country’s fight to regain the access to the Pacific
that it lost to Chile in the War of the Pacific in the 1870s. This can best be
achieved, it says, through creation of a Trinational Coordinating Committee of
the Peoples between Bolivia, Peru and Chile that can secure this demand in a
context of justice and solidarity.
Finally, the statement calls for
building “an instrument of political action of the social movements to discuss
actions in defence of those governments advancing progressive options for Latin
America, and in support of the struggles of other progressive revolutionary
processes.”
The workshop on this topic adopted
a number of proposals not included in the final declaration. Among these:
· To solve the problem of the land
and to recognize the right of the indigenous peasants to administer their own
lands, the development of comprehensive agrarian reform processes is key to
guaranteeing food sovereignty. Sale of land must be prohibited, and the
economic function of the land must be recognized.
· Monetary sovereignty.
Colonization also proceeds through monetary policy, hence the imposition of the
dollar. Rescue the Sucre as our regional currency and move toward monetary
integration, making the Sucre currency of common use.
· Strengthen the Bank of the South
(Banco del Sur) so that it can finance undertakings to achieve food
sovereignty, freeing us from transgenic seeds and preventing Monsanto from
invading our territories.
· Create an ALBA parliament.
· Create a continental coordination
of the peoples between Peru, Chile and Bolivia to help achieve Bolivian access
to the sea.
STRATEGY 3
DECOLONIZATION AND ANTI-IMPERIALISM
“It is not possible to speak of
national liberation and to recover economic and political sovereignty,” states
the preamble to this section, “without posing the need to build an alternative
vision to unfettered, extractivist and plundering capitalism.” This involves
“strengthening our diversity and interculturalism to achieve a sovereignty of
thinking and consciousness, recovering the ancestral knowledges of our peoples.”
Among the specific steps proposed
in order to promote decolonization and anti-imperialism are:
· the greater involvement of
anticapitalist and anti-imperialist social movements within formal and informal
international alliances and councils;
· the establishment of Constituent
Assemblies in all Latin American countries as well as on other continents in
order to found Plurinational States, the models here obviously being Bolivia
and Ecuador;
· creating social movement media on
a Latin American scale, with headquarters in Bolivia, to report on the various
experiences in their struggles;
· holding annual International
Anti-imperialist and Anticolonial Summits, preferably on July 28 to commemorate
the birth date of Hugo Chávez; and
· the creation of a University of
the Peoples of ALBA to “decolonize educational, institutional and mental
structures and develop our own Latin American projects and programs capable of
developing the region with its sovereignty, dignity, equity and identity.”
This section also calls for
demanding that imperialism pay its ecological debt; supporting the peace
process in Colombia, and supporting Puerto Rico’s independence. The workshop (mesa)
on this topic added a call for the withdrawal of Minustah[5] from Haiti.
STRATEGY 4
STRENGTHENING HUMAN RIGHTS AND THE RIGHTS OF MOTHER EARTH FROM
THE STANDPOINT OF THE PEOPLES
“Human rights from imperialism’s
perspective,” says the preamble to this section, “are a means of consolidating
a model of society that is individualistic, privatized, hierarchical and in
which the market has control and domination over our peoples.” This is the
outlook that has been incubated in the OAS’s Inter-American Commission on Human
Rights (IACHR) and in other international bodies. “But the international
actions taken recently against Evo Morales are not only an infringement of
international law by the states involved, they also demonstrate the decadence
of the European societies.”
The new vision of human rights must
reflect the thinking of the social movements, and states must be accountable to
those movements for their exercise of these rights. Human rights must be based
on anti-imperialist criteria and respect our cultures and our indigenous and
Afro-descendant identities. The new vision of human rights has to be based on
three pillars: universal recognition of the rights of Mother Earth; effective
recognition of the individual and collective rights of the peoples; and full
enforcement of economic, social, cultural and environmental rights.
In terms of specific actions, the
statement calls for discussion of a Universal Declaration on the Rights of
Mother Earth, recovering the cosmovision of our aboriginal rights as the basis
of the civilizing horizon of Vivir Bien; creation of an intercontinental organ
of social movements parallel to the United Nations; promotion and strengthening
of basic services as a human right; and “highlighting the importance of the
human rights of women and the need to struggle to eradicate femicide in our
region.”
And it calls for the immediate and
unconditional end to the inhuman economic, commercial and financial blockade of
Cuba and for its exclusion from the list of state sponsors of international
terrorism; the freeing of the four Cuban heroes unjustly imprisoned in the United
States; and the definitive closure of the centres of violation of human rights
installed in Latin America by the United States, such as the Guantánamo prison.
The workshop on this topic added a
call for independence of Puerto Rico.
STRATEGY 5
FIGHT AGAINST EXPIONAGE AND INTERFERENCE, TO FREE THE PEOPLES
FROM THE DOMINATION OF IMPERIALIST TERROR
The introduction to this section
analogizes the US counteroffensive in Latin America to “low-intensity warfare.”
In addition to the “international espionage” of the CIA, well-documented in
many countries, the recent revelations of Edward Snowden have shed light on the
extensive global network of digital spying “in violation of the privacy and
sovereignty of the progressive countries.”
To combat this imperialist
espionage, the declaration recommends the following actions, among others, to
strengthen popular and state sovereignty:
· the prompt creation of an ALBA
communications infrastructure to serve as an alternative and independent
internet network, linking the Latin American and Caribbean countries through
fibre optics technology;
· the construction of a Latin
American civilian and military intelligence and counter-intelligence centre, as
part of the ALBA Defence Doctrine, that can “train revolutionaries to confront
the imperialist espionage”; and
· the achievement of computer
sovereignty by nationalizing and developing state-controlled national
telecommunications firms and developing continental computer technology
networks using their own free software.
The workshop on this topic also
call for monitoring foreign NGOs in countries of the South, to ensure that they
do not service imperialism in their activities.
STRATEGY 6
TO COUNTER THE COLONIALISM OF DISINFORMATION,PEOPLE’S CONTROL
OVER THE COMMUNICATIONS MEDIA
Most of the private media in Latin
America, notes the preamble, are hostile to the anti-imperialist,
anticolonialist and anticapitalist positions of the progressive governments.
They work constantly to create social unrest. Examples cited are the
“media coup d’état perpetrated in Venezuela against Hugo Chávez in 2002, the
systematic media campaign in Bolivia in opposition to the process of change led
by Evo Morales…, and the political and media opposition in Ecuador to Rafael
Correa,” who has initiated legislation to undermine the private media
dictatorship in that country.
There is a great need, the
declaration says, to promote a system of independent communications spaces
through the establishment of alternative community media, using networks of
popular communications. Among the steps that can be taken, it adds, are:
· extending the TeleSUR and Radio
del Sur broadcasting networks throughout Latin America and the Caribbean;
· establishing and strengthening
popular communications networks (radio, television, social media networks) in
collaboration with the social movements and the communications media that
already exist; and
· establishing access to a state
and community media satellite network that “integrates radio and television
stations of the various social movements in our countries, broadcasts content
related to the liberation struggles of our peoples, and promotes the design of
communications content in native languages.”
The workshop on this topic proposed
in addition that strategic proposals along these lines be taken to the Second
World Summit on Indigenous Communications, to be held October 13-17 in Oaxaca,
Mexico.
STRENGTHENING THE
EMANCIPATORY POTENTIAL OF THE PEOPLES
This final section notes “the
legacy of the Cuban revolution,” which “opened the way” to all of today’s
“people’s governments and defenders of the social majorities.” And it
recognizes “the legacy of Chavismo, which allowed the development of a political
project of Latin American integration with socialism as its horizon,” adding
that this is a communitarian socialism born from our own peoples – indigenous
and workers – whose long memory and wisdom reaffirms for us not only the need
but the real possibility to construct a social order outside of the logics of
capital.”
“Latin America is experiencing one
of the most extraordinary cycles in its entire history,” the declaration says.
“The peoples of Abya
Yala,[6] in terms of both their position as a class and their position as
originary campesino indigenous peoples, have risen up and are moving toward
their final and full independence. This possibility of achieving emancipation,
more than 500 years after the European invasion and 200 years after achieving state
independence, has never before been presented with the force that it now has in
the present conditions: a rise in the degree of organization and consciousness
of the peoples, revolutionary and progressive governments, leaders with a great
historical dimension, and the emergence of initiatives of Latin American unity
and integration.”
But added to the structural
problems, which are simply the unpleasant residues of the old colonialism, are
other challenges in confronting the problems of the new colonialism. One is the
need to recover popular control over natural resources. Another is the need to
further “relations of collaboration, cooperation, solidarity and
complementarity between peoples and states.” And still another is to “develop
technology to change our productive matrix without affecting Mother Earth.”
To strengthen the emancipatory
potential of our peoples, the statement says, there must be a permanent
solidarity among them, expressed in concrete actions aimed against all forms of
oppression and domination; respect for the self-determination of the peoples,
national and popular sovereignty, etc., to build a society that is more
inclusive, more participatory, more democratic, more complementary and
solidaristic – one that allows us to live in harmony with Mother Earth.
[1] ALBA, the Alianza
Bolivariana para los Pueblos de Nuestra América; UNASUR, the Unión Suramericana
de Naciones.
[2] The Mérida Initiative
(also called Plan Mexico by critics) is a security cooperation agreement
between the United States and the government of Mexico and the countries of
Central America, with the declared aim of combating the threats of drug
trafficking, transnational organized crime and money laundering. The assistance
includes training, equipment and intelligence. (Wikipedia,http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M%C3%A9rida_Initiative)
[3] The Andean Counterdrug
Initiative (ACI) is a program operated within the US State Department that is
responsible for supporting anti-drug initiatives in Colombia and other South
American countries. ACI grew out of a controversial legislation, Plan Colombia,
which supported various drug wars in South America. The program seeks to
eradicate coca and induce local farmers to plant alternative crops. But for all
the money that has been spent towards stemming the flow of illegal drugs into
the United States from South America, little progress has been made in reaching
this goal. (http://tinyurl.com/ks6qb6nhttp://tinyurl.com/ks6qb6n )
[4] The Caribbean Basin
Initiative (CBI) was a unilateral and temporary United States program initiated
by the 1983 “Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery Act” (CBERA). The CBI came into
effect on January 1, 1984 and aimed to provide several tariff and trade
benefits to many Central American and Caribbean countries. It arose in the
context of a U.S. desire to respond with aid and trade to leftist movements
that were active in some countries of the region, such as the guerrillas in El
Salvador and the Sandinista government in Nicaragua. Provisions in the CBERA
prevented the U.S. from extending preferences to CBI countries that it judged
to be under the influence of Communists or that had expropriated American
property. (Wikipedia, http://tinyurl.com/k6h58ez)
[5] The United Nations
Stabilisation Mission In Haiti (MINUSTAH) is a United Nations “peacekeeping”
mission (actually occupation force) in Haiti that has been in operation since
2004, following the overthrow by France, the US and Canada of the elected
government headed by Jean-Bertrand Aristide. The mission's military component
is led by the Brazilian Army and the force commander is Brazilian. The force is
composed of 8,940 military personnel (including a small contingent from
Bolivia) and 3,711 police.
[6] Abya Yala is the name used
by many indigenous peoples to refer to the American continent since before the
arrival of Columbus.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment